The lawsuit didn’t include meaningful comparisons to sufficiently similar investment options, and the alleged underperformance of the disputed funds was too minor and too brief to warrant holding Sonic liable under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, Judge Kenneth D. Bell said in an opinion docketed May 1. He also rejected claims that certain funds should have been offered in cheaper share classes, saying plaintiff Joseph ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
