An attorney’s mistake as to whether a client needed to answer counterclaims filed against it isn’t “excusable neglect” justifying a late filing, the Fifth Circuit ruled Monday in a win for an insurance adjuster in a commissions dispute with his former company.
L.A. Public Insurance Adjusters Inc. should have realized it was required to answer Timothy Nelson’s counterclaims by a February 2019 court hearing at the latest, the court said in an unpublished split opinion.
But “rather than seeking to rectify the issue immediately, the company steadfastly maintained it was not required to file an answer,” the court said. This ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.