The proposed deal represents about 22% of the employees’ highest estimated damages in connection with the plan’s allegedly excessive recordkeeping fees, according to a March 1 settlement motion. The amount reflects the company’s “strenuous arguments” that the workers suffered no damages with respect to the investments challenged by the case, according to the motion.
The lawsuit says the company violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act by failing to obtain the cheapest available share classes for ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
