John Hancock wasn’t an ERISA fiduciary with regard to the credits, and to “rule otherwise” would give the plaintiffs a “windfall,” Judge Adalberto Jordan wrote Wednesday for the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. The disputed tax credits were owned by John Hancock—and thus weren’t assets of the relevant 401(k) plan—which means the company didn’t owe a fiduciary duty under ERISA with respect to its ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
