Plaintiff Paul Hutchins says HP’s retirement plan gives the California-based computer hardware maker discretion over whether to put forfeited money toward the contributions it’s required to make to the plan, or use that money to pay expenses that would otherwise be charged to plan participants. By consistently choosing the first option, HP puts its own financial interests ahead of the retirement savings of its workers, Hutchins says.
This choice ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.