Home health-care company
The proposed class action, filed Jan. 20 in the US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, claims the plan’s per-person administrative costs grew steadily over the past several years without any corresponding increase in services. These unreasonable fees “directly resulted” from the company’s choice to use high-cost mutual fund share classes that paid revenue to service providers, instead of cheaper, identical ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
