The insurer reasonably concluded the engineer wasn’t disabled because he could work 8-hour days, even though his employer required him to work 12-hour shifts, the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit said Monday. The engineer failed to show that 12-hour shifts were an “essential duty” that’s inherent to his occupation, the court said.
- Hartford’s letter denying Donald Artz’s benefits “could have been more plain and precise,” but the ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.