The insurer didn’t abuse its discretion in concluding that the plaintiff’s physical and mental limitations no longer prevented him from performing work that would pay him at least 80% of his pre-disability salary, Judge Brendan A. Hurson said in a Monday opinion. Hartford’s medical experts appropriately weighed the plaintiff’s subjective complaints of pain against “conflicting information” suggesting he had the capacity to work, said Hurson, who sits in the US District Court for ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.