The plan participants’ Employee Retirement Income Security Act claims fail under the standard set by the Ninth Circuit’s May decision in Anderson v. Intel Corp. Inv. Policy Comm., the court said Tuesday in a three-page, unpublished opinion. In Anderson, the appeals court said that ERISA claims of fiduciary imprudence based on retirement investments typically require a sound comparison to other investment options ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.