Texas-based engineering and construction firm
Judge Brantley Starr dismissed most of the case for lack of standing, explaining that one of the two named plaintiffs invested in none of the funds challenged by the lawsuit, while the other invested in only three. The performance and fees of investments not selected by a participant have no effect on the value of that participant’s account, he said.
Courts are split on whether retirement plan participants have standing to challenge any funds in their ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
