The plan’s “heavy, overly-concentrated position” in a single security should have served as a red flag prompting plan fiduciaries to diversify, plaintiffs John and Frances Quigley said in the complaint. The company acknowledged this risk by eliminating another single-stock investment from the plan and by limiting the amount of Phillips 66 stock in its pension plan, but it nevertheless allowed hundreds of millions of ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.