John Shulak, a participant in BMO’s defined contribution employee pension benefit plan, didn’t sufficiently allege the plan violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act by using the forfeited funds to offset BMO’s future contributions, the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois said Monday. He also failed to adequately claim that BMO’s fiduciary duties under ERISA required it to give participants benefits ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.