A former executive director for
First Reliance abused its discretion and engaged in a “self-serving, selective review of the evidence” when it terminated the director’s benefits without any “new, meaningful evidence” supporting a change in position, Judge Georgette Castner said. The insurer pointed to a questionnaire in which the director reported doing household chores and moving without assistive devices, but it overlooked other evidence showing she needed daily naps, required help ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.