The case’s legal theory “contravenes ERISA and decades of settled precedent” and would “create benefits beyond those promised in the Plan,” Judge Otis D. Wright II said in an opinion docketed Monday in the US District Court for the Central District of California. He dismissed the case in its entirety, explaining that the terms of AT&T’s retirement plan expressly authorize the telecom company to put forfeitures toward ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
