Retirement investors challenging their 401(k) investment options shouldn’t have to identify a “near-identical benchmark” to advance their case, the AARP said in a US Supreme Court brief backing
The retiree-focused group advised the justices to reject the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s “rigid” and “unworkable” take on the meaningful benchmark standard, which has been used in varying iterations by the Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, and Tenth circuits. The standard asks whether workers alleging fiduciary imprudence in their 401(k) plans have identified a better alternative that’s sufficiently similar to the fund or fee ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
