US Chief Justice
Roberts set a Sept. 15 deadline for Slaughter’s lawyers to respond to the Justice Department’s request to keep the commissioner out of her job longer-term while the legal fight over the merits plays out.
The administration is asking the high court to grant full review and consider overturning the 1935 precedent that let Congress set up independent agencies and shield their leaders from being fired. That Supreme Court ruling, known as Humphrey’s Executor, stemmed from President
“I intend to see this case through to the end,” Slaughter said in a statement. “In the week I was back at the FTC it became even more clear to me that we desperately need the transparency and accountability Congress intended to have at bipartisan independent agencies.”
The FTC didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.
The clash coincides with Trump’s effort to push out Federal Reserve Governor
Trump sought to remove Slaughter from her position in March. She
The conservative-majority Supreme Court has chipped away at Humphrey’s Executor in recent years, saying that powerful executive branch officials have to be accountable to the president.
In May, the Supreme Court let Trump
The court suggested in the NLRB and MSPB case that Trump’s power wouldn’t extend to firing Federal Reserve Chair
Defenders of Humphrey’s Executor say the Constitution gives Congress the flexibility to create agencies that rely on expert leadership and are independent from the White House.
The case is Trump v. Slaughter, 25A264.
(Updates with Slaughter comment in fifth graph.)
--With assistance from
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Sara Forden
© 2025 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.