Penguin Random House LLC must refrain from using certain economic data to justify its $2.18 billion acquisition of Simon & Schuster Inc., after a federal judge threw out defense testimony in the trial over the deal.
US District Judge Florence Pan excluded defendants’ so-called efficiencies evidence from the case, granting a motion from the Department of Justice.
The publishers have argued that the merger would increase efficiencies, or cost-saving moves designed to reduce redundancies and free up resources. Those efficiencies could translate into over $100 million in additional author compensation by 2025, according to the defense’s court filings.
But the ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.