The ex-employee’s California and federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act claims involve genuine factual disputes over whether he lost his job for cause, which wouldn’t require notice, or as part of a mass layoff, which would, the US District Court for the Northern District of California said in a brief docket-only order Wednesday denying X’s bid for summary judgment.
- Plaintiff Eitan Adler dropped the class claims from his WARN Act suit—one of ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.