A transportation company that terminated a class of more than 400 workers within two weeks of purchasing their former employer is liable for damages under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth ruled (Day v. Celadon Trucking Servs., Inc., 2016 BL 214623, 8th Cir., No. 15-1711, 7/5/16).
WARN Act cases that reach the federal appellate level are few and far between. The only other appeals court WARN Act ruling this year came from the Sixth Circuit, which found in January that Vanderbilt University didn’t violate the law.
Here, Celadon ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.