A former
UPS was entitled to summary judgment on the worker’s failure-to-accommodate claim under Washington’s Law Against Discrimination because he didn’t request blood testing as an alternative to a breathalyzer until after he had failed the breath test, the US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington said. The driver was subject to drug and alcohol testing under an agreement with UPS after having previously failed two ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.