The U.S. Supreme Court Jan. 7 declined to hear two petitions that could have provided litigants with clarity as to what a False Claims Act case must allege to advance.
The high court’s decision to reject the petitions ends defendants’ long-shot hopes to see the court adopt a rule clarifying that FCA cases in which the government continued to pay a contractor despite knowledge of misconduct must fail for lack of materiality.
Materiality concerns whether the government would have withheld payment to a contractor had it known about allegations of noncompliance. Both petitions concerned the impact of continued payments to ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.