Almost 6,000 Black workers from
Alameda County Superior Court Judge
The judge gave Tesla until Thursday to contest her ruling and scheduled a hearing for Friday for the parties to argue their positions.
The lawsuit was filed in 2017 by Tesla worker Marcus Vaughn, who claimed that the factory production floor was a “hotbed of racist behavior.” According to the complaint, co-workers and supervisors routinely used racial slurs, and employee complaints to human resources went largely unanswered.
Tesla initially responded to Vaughn’s suit with a blog post titled “Hotbed of Misinformation,” denying wrongdoing and saying the company had fired three people after probing alleged incidents.
Tesla representatives didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment on Wednesday’s ruling.
The judge said she would split the trial into two phases, if the case goes to trial. During the first, the jury would decide whether Tesla failed to do enough to prevent discrimination and harassment. If the jurors find Tesla liable, then in a second phase the plaintiffs would pursue their claims for damages.
The case is Vaughn v. Tesla, Inc., RG17882082, California Superior Court, Alameda County.
(Adds structure of trial and context on similar litigation in last two paragraphs.)
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Peter Blumberg, Peter Jeffrey
© 2024 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.