An arbitration clause in a Taco Bell job application is unenforceable because it’s unclear whether it applies to franchisees, a California appeals court ruled (Mendoza v. Century Fast Foods, Inc., 2016 BL 374132, Cal. Ct. App., 2d Dist., No. B267158, unpublished 11/9/16).
The ruling underscores that arbitration is a creature of contract law that is subject to ordinary rules of contract interpretation. The franchisee might have been successful if the arbitration clause used its name rather than a vague term.
Jesus Mendoza sued franchisee Century Fast Foods Inc. for allegedly failing to provide meal and rest breaks ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.