Rejection of Joe Biden’s student loan forgiveness plan suggests Supreme Court conservatives are going to be more comfortable with second-guessing federal agency determinations even when they fall within a federal statute.
Listen and subscribe to Cases and Controversies on Apple Podcasts , Spotify, Google Podcasts Megaphone, or Audible
UCLA law professor Adam Winkler joins “Cases and Controversies” to discuss what he’s calling the “supersized” Major Questions Doctrine, the high court-made principle that’s risen in recent terms and was the reasoning behind the 6-3 ruling in Biden v. Nebraska.
Podcast hosts Kimberly Robinson and Lydia Wheeler take listeners beyond the headlines of the biggest opinions of the term. They also look ahead to the one starting in October which Winkler says is shaping up as another with blockbuster potential on guns and the SEC.
Hosts: Kimberly Robinson and Lydia Wheeler
Guest: Adam Winkler
Producer: David Schultz
To contact the reporters on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.