- Case could have stripped SEC, FTC, CPSC of independence
- Appeal pressed by research groups represented by Don McGahn
The US Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal that sought to give the president control over agencies that have long operated independently, potentially including the
The appeal, pressed by two research organizations in a case involving the
The court, as is its custom when turning away an appeal, made no comment, and no justice publicly dissented.
The ruling, known as Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, upheld job protections for FTC commissioners and paved the way for the independent agencies that now proliferate across the US government.
The appeal was pressed by Consumers’ Research and By Two LP, whose lawyers include
Congress established the CPSC in 1972. The commission sets standards for thousands of products — including cribs, cleaning products, kitchen appliances and all-terrain vehicles — and can seek multimillion-dollar fines from violators.
The agency is headed by five commissioners who are appointed by the president for seven-year terms and can be fired only “for neglect of duty or malfeasance in office.”
The research groups sued the CPSC over its handling of Freedom of Information Act requests. In urging the court to reject the appeal, the Biden administration said the FOIA requests are insufficient to give the groups legal standing to challenge the commissioners’ job protections.
The case is Consumers’ Research v. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 23-1323.
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editor responsible for this story:
© 2024 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.