The US Supreme Court made it easier for whistleblowers to win suits claiming retaliation under a federal investor-protection law, reinstating a $900,000 jury verdict won by a fired
The justices, voting unanimously against UBS, said the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act doesn’t require whistleblowers to prove they were the victims of intentional retaliation.
A whistleblower who invokes the relevant US law bears the burden to prove that the protected activity was a contributing factor in their firing, but they are not required to make some further showing that the employer acted with retaliatory intent, the court said. ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.