The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on Thursday rejected Starbucks’ argument that the manager’s statements were permissible because they were limited to giving pins to customers on the selling floor—rather than illegally amounting to a pin ban covering the entire store as the National Labor Relations Board found.
“Even if Starbucks’ interpretation is reasonable, that is all it is—an interpretation,” the court said in ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.