The company violated federal labor law by telling workers it would be futile for them to join a union, Administrative Law Judge John Giannopoulos held Tuesday. Starbucks also unlawfully threatened to reduce or end benefits if workers voted to unionize, and said it would prioritize non-union stores while those with unions would miss out on added benefits, the judge found.
The workers elected Starbucks Workers United as their bargaining ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.