The coffee chain provided evidence that the worker electronically signed an arbitration agreement as part of the onboarding process, and the worker’s own evidence “largely substantiates Starbucks’s position,” the US District Court for the Southern District of New York said Tuesday.
Plaintiff Matthew Palmer started working at a Starbucks in Manhattan in 2015 and began transitioning in 2017. He says other employees then started harassing him, including by using feminine pronouns to refer ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.