- NLRB’s regulation on joint labor law liability expected soon
- Arizona senator looks to be thorn in labor board’s side
Sen.
Sinema said Tuesday that the rule proposed by the NLRB is “concerning,” and suggested she would vote to overturn the rule through a Congressional Review Act resolution. Under the CRA, Congress can reverse an agency’s rulemaking with a simple majority in both chambers.
“What we have seen in the proposal is very, very concerning,” Sinema said at an event sponsored by the International Franchise Association, which is lobbying Congress to overturn the NLRB rule once it’s finalized.
Sinema’s opposition shows that the NLRB’s proposal to change the joint employer standard faces a tough environment in Congress, where many lawmakers are concerned about what the rule could mean to franchises such as
The NLRB’s joint-employment framework determines when companies share liability for unfair labor practices and legal obligations to bargain with certified unions. In a break with its usual practice of setting standards via decisions in individual cases, the Trump board minted the current legal test with a regulation issued in 2020.
The NLRB’s Democratic majority last year proposed expanding what factors can trigger a joint-employer finding beyond simply one business exerting direct and immediate control over another company’s employees. The new test also would consider indirect and unexercised control.
The board plans to complete its joint employer regulation by Oct. 12, according to an August court filing.
Opposition Mounting
A bipartisan group composed of Sens.
“The six of us are already working together in a coalition to raise this concern,” she said. “Bureaucrats love red tape, that’s what they do. These are individuals who never owned a business, they probably don’t know franchise owners.”
Resolutions under the CRA follow a fast-track process that can circumvent Senate Majority Leader
Votes from Sinema, Manchin, and King would be crucial if all Republicans in the House and Senate vote to overturn the rule.
President
— With assistance from
— With assistance from
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
