The U.S. Supreme Court declined to consider whether Oakland, Calif., has standing to pursue antitrust claims over the relocation of the National Football League’s Raiders to Las Vegas.
The justices let stand a ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit that used a balancing test to hold the city lacks standing even though it had established antitrust injury.
The appeals court determined that the city lacks antitrust standing because of the indirectness of its injuries, the existence of more direct victims, the speculative measure of harm, and the difficulty in calculating damages.
The Raiders were based ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.