Online gaming platform provider
The company’s game-building model and its on-platform jobs hub enable it to employ children for game development without paying them in real-world currency, according to the complaint filed Tuesday in US District Court for the Northern District of California. The practice violates the child labor and minimum wage provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act along with California law, the plaintiff alleged.
The unnamed parent who brought the lawsuit said their 13-year-old son over the past two years provided “game design, development, and testing, including advanced Lua scripting, for one or more adult-led DevEx development teams, whose projects were hosted on Roblox and which generated revenue for Roblox.”
The child averaged more than 40 hours of work per week and received no monetary compensation, the complaint said.
The company’s marketing materials advertise the chance to “build your own games and make tons of money,” the plaintiff said.
Roblox originally launched as an educational platform where children and teens could learn basic software coding by building games. The company shifted in 2013 to a more profit-focused model, launching its DevEx program and encouraging developers to monetize their work by buying and selling on-platform products and services with the virtual currency Robux, according to the complaint.
Cashing out Robux for real-world currency is possible. But the conversion rate is so low that most developers receive little or no cash for their work, the plaintiff alleged. The majority of Roblox users are under 18, and nearly half of the 150 million daily active users are under 13.
The complaint says that though the “exploitation does not involve the once common hallmarks of child
labor—dangerous machinery, visible injuries, or blackened hands from a day in the mines—it is in several
ways more insidious” by dressing up child labor as a game “colorful, digital, and marketed to children as ‘fun.’”
Attorneys form Sbaiti & Company represent the plaintiffs.
Roblox didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
The case is Doe v. Roblox Corp., N.D. Cal., No. 3:26-cv-04405, 5/12/26.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
