The company was correct that Daniel J. Besiwanger Jr.'s suit doesn’t allege the required statistical disparity needed to prove Ricoh’s facially neutral no-weapons rule had an unintended discriminatory effect, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana said.
It wasn’t enough for Beiswanger to contend that Ricoh’s enforcement of the policy fell 100% ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.