The city of Pittsburgh must face a police officer’s claims that his job offer was pulled based on the mistaken perception that he was mentally unfit after he disclosed his ADHD during pre-employment psychological testing, the Third Circuit ruled Wednesday.
The case continues even though third-party psychologists—whom Pittsburgh contracted with—ran the tests that Christopher Gibbs alleges caused a rush to judgment and perception that ht was disabled, not the city itself, the appeals court said, overturning a lower court.
An employer may be held accountable under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act for participating in a contract ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.