Plaintiff William Hooker failed to show that the company’s stated reason for firing him—poor performance—was pretextual, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit said in an unpublished ruling.
The company documented two-and-a-half years of performance reviews under two different supervisors showing Hooker needed to improve his performance, including the drafting of multiple action plans and a performance improvement plan. He was finally terminated in August ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.