Potential legal challenges against the Biden administration’s new mental health parity rule would further define agencies’ regulatory leeway after the US Supreme Court scrapped a longstanding judicial deference doctrine.
The US Health and Human Services, Labor, and Treasury departments Sept. 9 finalized a new comparative test for health plans to ensure their mental health benefits are on par with medical and surgical coverage. Any challenge to the rule will play out under the Supreme Court’s June decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, which overturned the longstanding Chevron doctrine of deferring to agencies’ reasonable interpretations of ambiguous laws.
Employee ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.