California Supreme Court justices appeared skeptical of CNN arguments that the state’s anti-SLAPP statute, which protects free speech rights in matters of public interest, should defeat a black ex-producer’s discrimination and retaliation lawsuit.
The acronym SLAPP stands for “strategic lawsuits against public participation.” Under the statute, a defendant in California arguing that a lawsuit is infringing its free speech rights can ask a court to dismiss the lawsuit on that basis.
Justices during an hourlong hearing May 7 questioned CNN’s arguments that the court need not balance First Amendment principles against civil rights interests to determine whether the anti-SLAPP statute ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.