Information technology staffing and consulting companies are heavy users of the H-1B visa program, but the names of companies where they place those foreign workers have always been confidential.
The Labor Department, for the first time, has begun publishing the names of companies where H-1B holders are working, even if they’re employed by another company that provides staffing or consulting services. The public outing is the latest in a string of Trump administration policies targeting the specialty occupation visa program, which it sees as taking jobs away from Americans.
Aside from appearing to be an effort at shaming, release of the information may open up the client companies to more lawsuits—by both the government and American job applicants—claiming race or national-origin discrimination, as the vast majority of H-1B workers are from South Asia. Generally it’s been the direct employers, and not the clients, who’ve been targeted for litigation over discrimination and H-1B violations.
“This will be the most significant policy development in high-skill immigration of the year,” said
Representatives for the DOL didn’t respond to requests for comment. But in response to objections to the form change last year, the agency said it “needs to know where H-1B workers are placed, and with whom, for the protection of both those workers and similarly employed U.S. workers.”
The agency said it’s “sensitive” to concerns about confidentiality and competitiveness but that employers with those concerns can choose not to hire H-1B workers.
The new DOL data shows that staffing specialists such as
Cognizant’s clients include Blue Cross Blue Shield,
The majority of the companies contacted didn’t respond to requests for comment. But those that did didn’t seem bothered by their names being exposed.
SunTrust “complies with all regulatory requirements, including reporting, in its hiring and contracting practices,” a spokeswoman said. GlaxoSmithKline said it expects “our third-party contractors to follow all laws and regulations related to services provided on behalf of GSK.”
The administration’s policies appear to reflect a belief that companies consider workers’ visa status when making decisions such as whether to contract out certain functions, Melmed said.
“There’s a disconnect” between that belief and what actually happens in the business world, he said. A company is “going to make a business decision off of business interests,” which involve considerations of factors such as cost and skill set, not immigration, he said.
But with the new disclosures, businesses likely will start to take the immigration impact of their decisions into account more so than they do now, Melmed said.
If the DOL is trying to force companies to bring that work in-house, it “doesn’t make a lot of business sense,” said Sarah K. Peterson of SPS Immigration, a Minneapolis law firm. Companies don’t hire full-time staff in-house to perform a short-term project, she said.
This is “just the way that corporate America works today,” she said.
Slower, More Expensive
What’s more likely to happen, she said, is simply a renegotiation of the nondisclosure agreements that have been part of the services agreements between the consulting companies and their clients, which until the DOL’s action were almost always confidential.
It’s not going to stop companies from entering these agreements, but it makes the process “a little bit more complicated, a little bit more expensive, a little slower,” Peterson said.
Sara Blackwell of the Blackwell Firm in Sarasota, Fla., represented a group of former Walt Disney World tech workers who sued after they were laid off and forced to train their replacements, who were H-1B workers employed by Cognizant and HCL America Inc.
The layoffs, which took place in 2015, brought national attention to the H-1B program and landed it on President
Blackwell later dropped the lawsuit after concluding that the law allows displacement of U.S. workers by H-1B holders. She pledged to turn her efforts instead toward advocating for changes to the visa program.
Despite various Trump administration policies targeting the visa program, Blackwell says the business model persists, with whole IT departments and the jobs that go with them transferred to H-1B-dependent consulting companies and eventually offshored entirely.
“This will help us know which companies are actually using foreign workers through contracts,” Blackwell said, adding, “I don’t expect anything to change.”
What policy makers and advocates will do with the extra information being disclosed about H-1B users is the big question.
Many members of Congress “have no clue about immigration,” Blackwell said. “It’s very, very hard to get people to listen to us.”
Lawmakers trying to clamp down on the visa’s usage could put pressure on the secondary companies named in the data, said immigration attorney Mary Pivec of Pivec & Associates in Woodbridge, Va.
A spate of discrimination lawsuits have been filed against the consulting companies, though none have yet been successful. The new disclosures could create liability “if somebody wants to bring a lawsuit alleging that the secondary employer is discriminating against U.S. hires in this industry,” she said.
And because many of those employers are federal contractors, Pivec said, they could become targets of the Labor Department’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, which enforces equal pay and other nondiscrimination requirements.
The OFCCP already is pursuing a case against
But the “sad fact” is many U.S. workers “don’t have the skill sets to compete with foreign workers,” Pivec said.