Unions representing hundreds of thousands of federal workers asked a US judge to immediately block any mass firings by the Trump administration during the government shutdown while they press a legal challenge.
The emergency request Saturday night to US District Judge
“I think that if the president decides that the negotiations are absolutely going nowhere that there will start to be layoffs,” Hassett said Sunday on CNN’s State of the Union. “We think the Democrats, there’s a chance that they’ll be reasonable. Let’s get back into town on Monday, and if they are then I think there’s no reason for those layoffs.”
US government operations have been largely halted since Oct. 1 as budget talks between Democrats and Republicans remain at an impasse over a spending measure that would resume normal operations.
Trump, asked about job cuts at the White House on Sunday, said the firings are “taking place right now” and blamed the Democrats for the government shutdown.
It was not immediately clear whether any layoffs have taken place yet.
The unions that
Read More:
The White House didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
An estimated 750,000 federal workers are being furloughed daily during the shutdown, according to the Congressional Budget Office.
The lawsuit accuses the Office of Management and Budget — specifically its director,
Vought told House lawmakers on Oct. 1, the first day of the shutdown, that some agencies would move to terminate workers soon, Bloomberg News
The unions’ lawsuit focuses on a memo that the White House budget office
The unions argue that there’s no legal authority for the White House plan to permanently shed workers during a “lapse” in appropriations from Congress. After the shutdown, furloughed workers and employees who worked without paychecks receive back pay.
No end to the funding impasse is immediately in sight. While Republicans control both chambers of Congress, they need support from several Democrats to get the 60 votes needed for a spending bill to clear the Senate.
Democrats have sought health care-related concessions, specifically extending Affordable Care Act subsidies to address a jump in insurance premiums for millions of Americans.
The case is American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO v. Office of Management and Budget, 25-cv-8302, US District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).
(Updates with comments from Trump in sixth paragraph.)
--With assistance from
To contact the reporters on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Tony Czuczka, Wendy Benjaminson
© 2025 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.