Ex-Goldman Director’s Whistleblower Claims Go to Arbitration (1)

July 3, 2019, 2:19 PM UTCUpdated: July 3, 2019, 2:34 PM UTC

Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC convinced a federal court that arbitration is required to assess a former managing director’s claims that the company retaliated against him for blowing the whistle on alleged concealment of anti-money laundering compliance failures.

The employment contract Christopher Rollins signed validly calls for all employment-related matters to be settled by arbitration, Judge Edgardo Ramos of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled July 2.

Employment-related matters cover allegations Goldman Sachs retaliated against Rollins for disclosing his reasonable belief that the company violated Commodity Futures Trading Commission and Securities Exchange Commission regulations ...

Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:

See Breaking News in Context

Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.

Already a subscriber?

Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.