Eastman Voting Data Witness Doesn’t Value Research Peer Review

A witness who sent Donald Trump attorney John Eastman reports of allegedly abnormal voting data from the 2020 election said Thursday during cross examination that he doesn’t “pay much attention to peer review,” a process that is widely regarded as a basis for credibility in published research.

In a bid to keep Eastman from losing his California law license, Eastman’s legal team is arguing before California State Bar Court Judge Yvette Roland that the memos he wrote to Trump campaign officials prior to the riot at the US Capitol have a basis. The state bar says Eastman’s memos to ...