- Ruling is boost for Desantis ahead of 2024 US election
- Florida law grants governors latitude in executive authority
US District Judge
The ruling Friday comes as the US presidential race starts to heat up. The 44-year-old governor, who
In dismissing the lawsuit that state prosecutor Andrew Warren filed against DeSantis to get his job back, Hinkle wrote that the governor had clearly violated Warren’s First Amendment rights under the US Constitution by targeting him based on his public statements.
He found that DeSantis had breached the Florida Constitution, too, as there was “not a hint of misconduct” by Warren in office and it was clear that the prosecutor “was diligently and competently performing the job he was elected to perform.”
Still, Hinkle said, as a federal judge his hands were tied. The US Constitution’s 11th Amendment “prohibits a federal court from awarding declaratory or injunctive relief of the kind at issue against a state official based only on a violation of state law,” he wrote.
Warren said that it was clear his suspension was a “political stunt” intended to serve as an anecdote in the governor’s stump speech while on the campaign trail.
“The idea that a governor can break federal and state law to suspend an elected official should send shivers down the spine of anyone who cares about free speech, the integrity of our elections or the rule of law, three core principles on which our democracy is built,” Warren said in a statement issued after the judge ruled.
The judge did find that other factors had spurred DeSantis to act. He said it was clear that the governor and members of his staff were motivated by a desire to remove a prosecutor whose performance in office didn’t align with their “law-and-order” agenda. He said it didn’t matter whether Warren had actually adopted a policy against prosecuting cases under the state’s abortion ban.
“The governor would have made the same decision anyway, even without considering these things,” Hinkle wrote. “The First Amendment violations were not essential to the outcome and so do not entitle Mr. Warren to relief in this action.”
After the US Supreme Court in June
DeSantis removed him from his position in August.
Some legal experts had
The case is Warren v. DeSantis, 22-cv-00302, US District Court, Northern District of Florida (Tallahassee).
Read More
They Pledged Not to Prosecute Abortions. The Reality Is Tougher DeSantis Ignores Trump, Touts Florida Victory at Donors Event DeSantis Has Advantage in Battle Over Prosecutor’s Suspension
(Adds statement from prosecutors and details from ruling.)
--With assistance from
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Steve Stroth, Joe Schneider
© 2023 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.