A former manager at Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co. failed to state plausible claims for breach of contract and wrongful termination after he was fired allegedly for refusing to aggressively interrogate a Burmese hire about his immigration status, a federal court in Texas ruled April 9 (Adams v. Mut. of Omaha Ins. Co., 2014 BL 99979, N.D. Tex., 13-4881, 4/9/14).
Lowell Adams couldn’t overcome the state law presumption of at-will employment by pointing to corporate policies and oral representations, because employment handbooks are considered guidelines rather than express agreements to limit an employer’s right to fire without ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.