The warehouse juggernaut tried to argue that its employee, Dawn Suppo, was only touched on her face and wrists and only had to endure unwanted, overly friendly conversations from the customer she alleged was a stalker. “Yet Costco’s argument implies a position inconsistent with our case law: that harassment must be overtly sexual to be actionable under Title VII,” Judge
Suppo’s alleged stalker ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.