A Tennessee federal district court partially granted and denied both United Parcel Service’s motion for a protective order and a plaintiff’s motion to compel regarding Rule 30(b)(6) deposition topics in a case where a White supervisor with diabetes alleged retaliation under the Tennessee Disability Act and Family Medical Leave Act after being terminated for allegedly using a racial slur, finding that while many of the supervisor’s proposed deposition topics were overbroad or irrelevant, some topics were appropriate with geographic and temporal limitations to ensure discovery remained proportional to the needs of the case.
This story was produced by Bloomberg Law ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.