Case: Individual Employment Rights/First Amendment (W.D. Wash.)

May 7, 2024, 7:28 PM UTC

A Washington federal district court denied several officials of the University of Washington’s motion to dismiss a First Amendment retaliation claim of a faculty member who included a disruptive statement regarding indigenous land ownership in his class syllabus, finding that the speech was related to scholarship or teaching, and involved a matter of public concern, but that a fact-sensitive Pickering v. Board of Education balancing test can’t be employed at this stage of litigation.

Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:

See Breaking News in Context

Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.

Already a subscriber?

Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.