A Washington federal district court denied several officials of the University of Washington’s motion to dismiss a First Amendment retaliation claim of a faculty member who included a disruptive statement regarding indigenous land ownership in his class syllabus, finding that the speech was related to scholarship or teaching, and involved a matter of public concern, but that a fact-sensitive Pickering v. Board of Education balancing test can’t be employed at this stage of litigation.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.