A Michigan federal district court granted summary judgment to Michigan State University officials on a First Amendment retaliation claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 brought by a community nutrition instructor who alleged he was terminated for running for and winning election as county commissioner, finding that MSU officials established they would have terminated him regardless of his protected political activity due to legitimate concerns about conflicts of interest and time commitments between his university position and commissioner role.
This story was produced by Bloomberg Law Automation and edited by Bloomberg Law staff.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.