Case: Discrimination/Sexual Harassment (D. Minn.)

A Minnesota federal district court denied Chipotle’s motion for protective order and granted a female employee’s motion to compel and for sanctions regarding Rule 30(b)(6) deposition topics in her sexual harassment and assault case, finding that Chipotle failed to meet and confer in good faith, made arguments based on outdated versions of deposition topics, produced an inadequately prepared witness, and misrepresented the scope of an EEOC consent decree, ordering a second deposition with a properly prepared corporate witness and awarding the employee attorneys’ fees and costs.

This story was produced by Bloomberg Law Automation and edited by Bloomberg Law staff. ...