A federal district court granted summary judgment to the Arizona Board of Regents on a female non-tenure track assistant professor’s sex discrimination claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, finding that she failed to provide sufficient evidence that the university’s legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for not renewing her contract—that her non-renewal would cause the “least harm” to the journalism program—was pretextual, particularly given the “same-actor inference” where the administrator who advocated for her promotion later selected her for non-renewal.
This story was produced by Bloomberg Law Automation and edited by Bloomberg Law staff.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.