A California truck driver failed to prove CRST Van Expedited prevented meal and rest breaks as a companywide practice for him and his fellow workers, the Ninth Circuit said Thursday in an unpublished ruling.
The company satisfied the obligations under California law to provide the required breaks to the drivers, as no formal policy prevented them from stopping, a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit said. It upheld a lower court’s ruling that de-certified the proposed class and tossed the driver’s claim.
The appeals court had previously asked the California Supreme Court to weigh in ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.